journal 6

Technology and Teacher Retention
By Robert Kadel

Robert Kadel is a researcher who studies content for education and learning. In doing this, Kadel looks further into the idea of technology and it’s benefits for teachers. In this article titled, Technology and Teacher Retention, Kadel brings forth the issue of what makes up a good technology supportive environment (TSE). He believes that technology plays an important part in teacher retention. Kadel also believes that technology and teacher participation go hand in hand when discussing the benefits of technology. With his background, Robert Kadel researched the relationship between teachers and technology and tried to come up with a concept that would create an effective TSE. Lessen and Sorensen in 2006, came up with four key areas to focus on, they include: making technology a priority to teachers, establishing a technological infrastructure, work on development, and lastly create a training and support system for students, faculty and staff. Researchers believe that with these concepts and positive attitudes from teachers, a good TSE is possible.

Question 1- What do you think some drawbacks might be with creating a TSE?

I think it might be difficult to reach all teachers and therefore make it difficult to create a technological supportive environment. If some are reluctant to becoming technologically savvy, and instead refuse to move forward in that direction, the environment might change from stale to hostile. However, I believe if your school is for technological advancement then a success is possible. I agree with the article when it states that a positive attitude from teachers and administration is key and without it, any movement would be difficult.

Question 2- What is one creative way administrators can enforce this idea without having to bring negative ‘vibes’ in?

Perhaps one possibility to enforce a TSE would be to make it into a team effort. Create different teams within the teachers and create a contest with rewards. Which ever team can learn and use and then implement the ideas into their classroom most effectively would be the winners. Toward the end of the 2-year program, every team would win.